NIST 800-53
Link technical policies and their evaluation results to catalog controls. Review the source evidence, tested scope, and gaps for each assessment.
Technical control evidence
From a real test
to a reviewable control record.
Run checks with CI/lock. Keep signed evidence. Use the platform to connect the results to the controls they support.
Technical assurance, built on execution
Don’t just document it.
Demonstrate it.
Remediation checks. Recovery rehearsals. Configuration tests. Capture the technical evidence that is hard to track in a GRC checklist, then map it to the controls it supports.
From a test run to a control record.
CI/lock runs your existing checks and captures signed results. The platform evaluates the evidence and links the result to your selected controls, including FedRAMP 20x KSIs.
- 01Run the check
Use the tools and scripts your team already trusts.
- 02Keep the signed result
Retain the tested subject, execution context, and signer.
- 03Connect it to the control
Give reviewers a path from the control to the actual evidence.
EVIDENCE → CONTROLIllustrative workflow
01 / CI/lock check
Disaster recovery rehearsal
Restore the service and test it against your recovery objectives.
02 / Signed evidenceRecovery test completed
Retain the tested environment, recovery measurements, and result.
03 / Platform mapping
CP-4 · Contingency Plan Testing
FedRAMP 20x · KSI-RPL-TRCSupports review of tested recovery capabilities.
Example mappings support a control assessment. Catalog version, scope, and coverage still matter.
The full picture
Every capability. A clear place in the platform.
Explore evidence collection, gate management, technical assurance, identity, integrations, and deployment.
Frameworks and scope
One evidence foundation.
Clear assessment boundaries.
Mappings depend on catalog version, deployment, and the scope of the check. Coverage is something to inspect, not assume.
FedRAMP 20x KSIs
Connect signed operational tests to relevant Key Security Indicators. Recovery rehearsals, configuration checks, and remediation verification provide concrete evidence for review.
FedRAMP baselines
Discuss the required baseline, boundary, and evidence coverage with our team. Mappings support assessment work; they do not constitute a FedRAMP authorization.
SOC 2
Use technical evidence to support relevant criteria alongside your broader organizational control program. Confirm the required scope and mapping coverage with the team.
CMMC and NIST 800-171
Discuss your selected control catalog, applicable scope, and technical evidence requirements. A test result supports an assessment of the corresponding practice.
DoD and restricted environments
Discuss the deployment architecture, control catalog, and evidence boundary your program requires before selecting a configuration.
ISO 27001
Ask about the current mapping coverage and availability for your deployment. Organizational requirements still need their own evidence and assessment.
EU Cyber Resilience Act
Discuss software provenance, vulnerability-handling evidence, and the technical records your product needs. Availability and coverage should be confirmed for your requirements.
Your control catalog
Bring your internal requirements and technical tests. We can discuss how to connect the evidence to the controls your team needs to demonstrate.
Start with your evidence
What do you need to demonstrate?
Walk through a recovery test, a remediation check, or a requirement unique to your team.